Wednesday 27 July 2022

The Squabble for the Guise Fortune

The house of Guise had made itself infamous throughout the 16th century; the house had divided itself into several branches, the eldest of which was headed by the Duc de Guise. However, in 1688, the Ducs de Guise died out with the death of Marie de Lorraine, Duchesse de Guise. 


The reigning ducal couple of Guise was Charles de Lorraine and his wife Henriette Catherine de Joyeuse. The couple had had ten children of which seven were boys - few had probably expected the family to find itself extinct within a generation. Yet, two of their sons died in infancy, one entered the church while the other four died unexpectedly young at the respective ages of 27, 19, 33 and 24. Ironically, the eldest was the son who entered the church and thus fathered no children. As for the daughters, one died in infancy, another entered a nunnery - and then there was Marie.


1656 enngraving of Marie of Lorraine, Duchess of Guise (Balthazar Moncornet).jpg
Marie de Lorraine, Duchesse de 
Guise


Marie de Lorraine was unmarried and thus childless. She had won the guardianship over her nephew, Louis, who was the only surviving male heir to the house of Guise. However, the young boy died in 1675 which left Marie as the sole survivor of the Guise-family.

As the last Guise, Marie enjoyed the benefits of an enormous fortune including several duchies and their numerous incomes. By the late 1680's, Marie was in her early seventies and knew that she had to make a decision as to who would inherit her. When Marie de Lorraine died on 3 March 1688, her last will and testament revealed that she had deliberately attempted to exclude her niece, the Grande Mademoiselle, from inheriting - and so, the legal drama began.

Besides the Grande Mademoiselle, there were two other major players claiming their share of the inheritance. One was Leopold, Duc de Lorraine and another was Anne Henriette, Princesse de Condé. 


The Will

Marie herself had favoured leaving all to Charles Leopold, father of Leopold, and the then-reigning. Duc de Lorraine. However, Charles Leopold died in 1690 before the case was settled at court which meant that Leopold was left to fight for his inheritance. The case might have ended there if there had not been a minor thing to consider: the will of the king. Louis XIV was far from pleased at having such a large fortune - and a duchy on his border - going to a man who served the Holy Roman Emperor as a general. Thus, the Sun King protested the will and sent it to the Parlament de Paris.


As for her hôtel in Paris - lavishly updated by Marie - she left it to a rather surprising recipient: Charles François de Stainville,  Comte de Couvonges. By her own will, Marie had chosen the Hôtel-Dieu in Paris (a charitable hospital) as the executor of her testament - she also left them a hefty sum of 53.000 livres.


One might wonder exactly why this particular will and testament was so vital. For one, the house of Guise had a very large fortune as well as considerable land possessions. However, that was not all at stake. For one, the owner of the duchy of Guise was entitled to having their lawsuits decided by either the king's own council or by their own peers at the Parlament. Furthermore, there was the question of the rank of prince étrangère which in itself gave the incumbent certain privileges such as keeping one's hat on when with ambassadors, sitting with the queen and direct access to the king. Consequently, the will was a matter of vital importance to courtiers who could only hope for advancement from the king himself. 

The Claims

Anne Henriette of Bavaria was amongst those who happily agreed with the king's decision. She had married the Prince de Condé. She based her claim on her great-grandfather Charles of Lorraine (another one!), Duc de Mayenne. He had married Henriette of Savoy with whom he had had Catherine de Lorraine who in turn went on to marry Charles Gonzaga, Duke of Mantua. Their youngest daughter was Anne-Marie who was married off to the Count of Simmern with whom she had Anne Henriette, Princesse de Condé. Another daughter was Bénédicte of the Palatinate who joined her claim to that of her sister.

Thus, Anne's claim rested already on the link through her mother and grandmother. However, there was another potential connection. Anne-Marie had fallen in love with Henri II de Guise, Duc de Guise, and even claimed to have married him - however, Henri denied it and she was packed off to her German husband.


Leopold de Lorraine's claim went back the furthest and was based entirely on the fact that he was the next male in line. His great-great-great-great-great grandfather was René II de Lorraine who fathered two separate lines: Antoine (Duc de Lorraine) and Claude (Duc de Guise). He was therefore a distant cousin to Marie de Lorraine.


Portrait en pied de Léopold Ier Duc de Lorraine.jpg
Leopold de Lorraine


The Grande Mademoiselle asserted her claim through her grandmother, Henriette Catherine de Joyeuse, whose first marriage had been to the Duc de Montpensier. It was their union that produced Marie de Bourbon who would marry Gaston d'Orléans and give birth to the Grande Mademoiselle. Consequently, the Grande Mademoiselle's claim was entirely through the female line.


While these three were the most illustrious claimants, they were by no means the only ones. Amongst those who turned up at the Hôtel-Dieu to press their claims were Béatrix de Lorraine, the Prince d'Harcourt, Élisabeth de Lorraine, the Prince de Lillebonne and the Prince de Commercy.


In summary, two distinct families within the house of Bourbon contested the will: the Bourbon-Condé (through Anne Henriette and Bénédicte) and the Bourbon-Montpensier (through the Grande Mademoiselle).

Yet, there was one person who was conspicuous by their absence: the Duc d'Elbeuf. He was technically the next male in line, so it would seem odd that he did not press his own claim. Liesbeth Geevers and Mirella Marini has pointed to the fact that the dukedom of Guise would bestow a peerage on the recipient but the Duc d'Elbeuf was already a peer in his own right. It therefore made no sense to go through an expensive and likely drawn-out legal battle to obtain what he already possessed. 


Anne Marie Louise d'Orléans, Duchess of Montpensier, La Grande Mademoiselle - Versailles MV 3476.jpg
La Grande Mademoiselle


The Decision

By order of the king, the Parisian Parlament examined the last will and testament of Marie de Lorraine for a month and a half. They reached their final decision on 26 April 1688. Considering the king's clear opinion on the matter, their decision did not come as much of a surprise: it was completely overturned, thus stripping the Comte de Couvonges of his dues.

Consequently, the titles were divided between these two women. The principality of Joinville (title: Prince de Joinville) went to the Grande Mademoiselle, the duchy of Guise (title: Duc de Guise) to Anne Henriette while the Duc d'Elbeuf (another Lorraine) got the Duchy of Joyeuse.


The Arguments

The case of the Duchesse de Guise's will is a complex one due primarily to the intricate familial links between several aristocratic houses across various borders. When all was said and done, the Parlament rested their decision on the piece of legislation known as the Droit d'Aubaine.

Amongst others, the Droit d'Aubaine made it impossible for French estates to be left to people who had been born on foreign soil - unless they had been naturalised. This immediately excluded several of the would-be pretenders to the duchies and principalities in hand:

Leopold's father, Charles V of Lorraine, was born in Vienna but was naturalised as a Frenchman in the 1650's - however Leopold himself had never been naturalised. He could therefore not inherit either the duchies or the principalities, much to the delight of Louis XIV.

Another potential candidate, the Prince de Salm, based his claim on the very same basis as both Anne Henriette and Bénédicte. His mother had been their elder sister, Louise-Marie, who had died before the Duchesse de Guise. However, by virtue of his being the son of the eldest daughter, he was a likely candidate to inherit. But to his great misfortune - in this case at least - he had not been born in Paris like his mother but in Aachen. Furthermore, he was not even residing in France but in Vienna. He therefore made just as unpalatable an heir to Louis XIV as Leopold. Luckily for Louis, the Droit d'Aubaine also excluded him.

Even then, there were two other people who could have pressed their claims: the Duke of Mantua (through Charles de Lorraine, Duc de Mayenne) and his immediate heir Archduchess Eleonora Maria. The Duke of Mantua had no sons and Eleonora was his niece. As they had both descended from a male "higher up" in the family tree, both the Duke of Mantua and the Archduchess might have laid claim to the titles if they had not been born foreigners. The Duke of Mantua had been born in his own duchy while Eleonora was born in Regensburg.

Consequently, the Parlament de Paris concluded that the most senior natural heir to the Duchesse de Guise was Anne Henriette, Princesse de Condé by marriage.


Anne de Bavière, princesse de Condé - Versailles MV 3555.jpg
Anne Henriette - the overall
winner of the case


No comments:

Post a Comment